Generalize the admin model from "single root super-admin" to a delegated chain: a `<dir>/.zddc/admins` list grants admin authority for that subtree, with a strict-ancestor rule preventing self-elevation (you cannot edit the .zddc that grants your own authority — only files strictly below it). Add a guided server-rendered editor at /.admin/zddc/edit?path=<dir> so subtree admins can manage their fiefdoms without filesystem access. JSON API at /.admin/zddc covers GET (file + effective chain + can_edit), POST (atomic write + cache invalidation), DELETE, plus a /tree endpoint listing every .zddc visible to the caller. Optional theming via <root>/.admin.css. Validation: glob syntax check, root-self-demotion rejection, reserved-prefix path guard, YAML round-trip sanity. Writes are atomic (temp file + fsync + rename) and invalidate the policy cache. Also includes the prior in-flight `Title` field on ProjectInfo so per-project .zddc titles surface on the landing-page picker. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
250 lines
6.8 KiB
Go
250 lines
6.8 KiB
Go
package zddc
|
|
|
|
import "testing"
|
|
|
|
func TestGlobMatch(t *testing.T) {
|
|
cases := []struct {
|
|
pattern string
|
|
s string
|
|
want bool
|
|
}{
|
|
// Literal (no wildcard)
|
|
{"alice", "alice", true},
|
|
{"alice", "bob", false},
|
|
{"", "", true},
|
|
{"", "x", false},
|
|
|
|
// Lone wildcard
|
|
{"*", "anything", true},
|
|
{"*", "", true},
|
|
|
|
// Prefix wildcard
|
|
{"*@example.com", "@example.com", true},
|
|
{"*.com", "example.com", true},
|
|
{"*.com", "example.org", false},
|
|
|
|
// Suffix wildcard
|
|
{"alice*", "alice", true},
|
|
{"alice*", "alice@example.com", true},
|
|
{"alice*", "bob", false},
|
|
|
|
// Middle wildcard
|
|
{"a*b", "ab", true},
|
|
{"a*b", "axxxb", true},
|
|
{"a*b", "axxx", false},
|
|
{"a*b", "xxxb", false},
|
|
|
|
// Multiple wildcards
|
|
{"*-*-*", "a-b-c", true},
|
|
{"*-*-*", "ab-c", false},
|
|
|
|
// Anchored: no implicit leading wildcard
|
|
{"alice@*", "bob@example.com", false},
|
|
}
|
|
for _, tc := range cases {
|
|
t.Run(tc.pattern+"|"+tc.s, func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
if got := globMatch(tc.pattern, tc.s); got != tc.want {
|
|
t.Errorf("globMatch(%q, %q) = %v, want %v", tc.pattern, tc.s, got, tc.want)
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestMatchesPattern(t *testing.T) {
|
|
cases := []struct {
|
|
pattern string
|
|
email string
|
|
want bool
|
|
}{
|
|
// Exact match
|
|
{"alice@example.com", "alice@example.com", true},
|
|
{"alice@example.com", "bob@example.com", false},
|
|
|
|
// Wildcard local part, fixed domain
|
|
{"*@example.com", "alice@example.com", true},
|
|
{"*@example.com", "anyone@example.com", true},
|
|
{"*@example.com", "alice@evil.com", false},
|
|
|
|
// Fixed local part, wildcard domain
|
|
{"alice@*", "alice@example.com", true},
|
|
{"alice@*", "alice@evil.com", true},
|
|
{"alice@*", "bob@example.com", false},
|
|
|
|
// @-boundary respected: * in local part does not eat the @
|
|
{"alice*", "alice@example.com", true}, // pattern has no @, matches against full email
|
|
// But splitting on @ for both sides:
|
|
{"*", "alice@example.com", true}, // lone * matches anything
|
|
{"*@*", "alice@example.com", true},
|
|
{"*@*", "no-at-sign", false}, // pattern has @, email doesn't
|
|
|
|
// Pattern with @, email without
|
|
{"alice@example.com", "alice", false},
|
|
|
|
// Empty email: lone "*" should still match per docstring? Actually globMatch("*", "") = true
|
|
// But MatchesPattern("*", "") splits "*" on @ → ["*"]. Then globMatch("*", "") = true.
|
|
// The docstring says "matches any non-empty email" but the implementation matches empty too.
|
|
// Document the actual behavior in the test.
|
|
{"*", "", true},
|
|
}
|
|
for _, tc := range cases {
|
|
t.Run(tc.pattern+"|"+tc.email, func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
if got := MatchesPattern(tc.pattern, tc.email); got != tc.want {
|
|
t.Errorf("MatchesPattern(%q, %q) = %v, want %v", tc.pattern, tc.email, got, tc.want)
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestAllowedAtLevel(t *testing.T) {
|
|
cases := []struct {
|
|
name string
|
|
level ZddcFile
|
|
email string
|
|
wantAllowed bool
|
|
wantMatched bool
|
|
}{
|
|
{
|
|
name: "no rules: not matched",
|
|
level: ZddcFile{},
|
|
email: "alice@example.com",
|
|
wantAllowed: false,
|
|
wantMatched: false,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "allow matched",
|
|
level: ZddcFile{ACL: ACLRules{
|
|
Allow: []string{"*@example.com"},
|
|
}},
|
|
email: "alice@example.com",
|
|
wantAllowed: true,
|
|
wantMatched: true,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "deny matched",
|
|
level: ZddcFile{ACL: ACLRules{
|
|
Deny: []string{"alice@example.com"},
|
|
}},
|
|
email: "alice@example.com",
|
|
wantAllowed: false,
|
|
wantMatched: true,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "deny wins over allow at the same level",
|
|
level: ZddcFile{ACL: ACLRules{
|
|
Allow: []string{"*@example.com"},
|
|
Deny: []string{"alice@example.com"},
|
|
}},
|
|
email: "alice@example.com",
|
|
wantAllowed: false,
|
|
wantMatched: true,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "neither rule matches",
|
|
level: ZddcFile{ACL: ACLRules{
|
|
Allow: []string{"*@example.com"},
|
|
Deny: []string{"*@evil.com"},
|
|
}},
|
|
email: "carol@other.org",
|
|
wantAllowed: false,
|
|
wantMatched: false,
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
for _, tc := range cases {
|
|
t.Run(tc.name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
gotAllowed, gotMatched := AllowedAtLevel(tc.level, tc.email)
|
|
if gotAllowed != tc.wantAllowed || gotMatched != tc.wantMatched {
|
|
t.Errorf("AllowedAtLevel(%v, %q) = (%v, %v), want (%v, %v)",
|
|
tc.level, tc.email, gotAllowed, gotMatched, tc.wantAllowed, tc.wantMatched)
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestAllowedWithChain(t *testing.T) {
|
|
allow := func(p ...string) ZddcFile { return ZddcFile{ACL: ACLRules{Allow: p}} }
|
|
deny := func(p ...string) ZddcFile { return ZddcFile{ACL: ACLRules{Deny: p}} }
|
|
allowDeny := func(a, d []string) ZddcFile { return ZddcFile{ACL: ACLRules{Allow: a, Deny: d}} }
|
|
empty := ZddcFile{}
|
|
|
|
cases := []struct {
|
|
name string
|
|
chain PolicyChain
|
|
email string
|
|
want bool
|
|
}{
|
|
{
|
|
name: "empty chain, no files: default allow",
|
|
chain: PolicyChain{HasAnyFile: false},
|
|
email: "alice@example.com",
|
|
want: true,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "files exist but no rule matches: default deny",
|
|
chain: PolicyChain{Levels: []ZddcFile{allow("*@trusted.com")}, HasAnyFile: true},
|
|
email: "alice@example.com",
|
|
want: false,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "leaf allow wins",
|
|
chain: PolicyChain{Levels: []ZddcFile{empty, allow("*@example.com")}, HasAnyFile: true},
|
|
email: "alice@example.com",
|
|
want: true,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "leaf deny beats parent allow (bottom-up first match)",
|
|
chain: PolicyChain{Levels: []ZddcFile{
|
|
allow("*@example.com"),
|
|
deny("alice@example.com"),
|
|
}, HasAnyFile: true},
|
|
email: "alice@example.com",
|
|
want: false,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "leaf has no rule for user, falls back to parent allow",
|
|
chain: PolicyChain{Levels: []ZddcFile{
|
|
allow("*@example.com"),
|
|
allow("bob@example.com"), // doesn't match alice
|
|
}, HasAnyFile: true},
|
|
email: "alice@example.com",
|
|
want: true,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "leaf allows user that parent denies",
|
|
chain: PolicyChain{Levels: []ZddcFile{
|
|
deny("alice@example.com"),
|
|
allow("alice@example.com"),
|
|
}, HasAnyFile: true},
|
|
email: "alice@example.com",
|
|
want: true, // leaf wins
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "multi-level: deepest match wins",
|
|
chain: PolicyChain{Levels: []ZddcFile{
|
|
allow("*@example.com"),
|
|
allowDeny([]string{"*@example.com"}, []string{"alice@example.com"}),
|
|
allow("alice@example.com"), // deepest re-allows alice
|
|
}, HasAnyFile: true},
|
|
email: "alice@example.com",
|
|
want: true,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "no match anywhere with files present: deny",
|
|
chain: PolicyChain{Levels: []ZddcFile{empty, empty, empty}, HasAnyFile: true},
|
|
email: "alice@example.com",
|
|
want: false,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "no match anywhere without files: allow",
|
|
chain: PolicyChain{Levels: []ZddcFile{empty, empty, empty}, HasAnyFile: false},
|
|
email: "alice@example.com",
|
|
want: true,
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
for _, tc := range cases {
|
|
t.Run(tc.name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
if got := AllowedWithChain(tc.chain, tc.email); got != tc.want {
|
|
t.Errorf("AllowedWithChain = %v, want %v", got, tc.want)
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
}
|