Commit graph

1 commit

Author SHA1 Message Date
90aca07539 docs: federal compliance page (federal.html) + home-page cross-links
A non-technical entry point for federal evaluators answering "can this
go in our environment, and what would need to be added during ATO?" —
the question that today only has an answer buried in the engineering
README.

Six sections, written for the procurement / decision-maker audience
with engineers as the secondary reader:

  1. Hero: ZDDC is designed to be deployed in regulated environments.
  2. What's already in place — hardened TLS posture, pluggable OPA
     policy engine, federal-mode strict-least-privilege Rego, audit
     logging, vulnerability-disclosure policy, documented access-
     control model with a 5-minute verify-it recipe.
  3. Supported deployment shape — diagram showing zddc-server on
     loopback behind a TLS-terminating proxy on a RHEL/UBI base.
  4. What you'd add for full ATO — table of five integration items
     (FIPS-validated crypto, authenticated proxy↔server channel, RBAC,
     policy export, code-signed tool fetches) with plain-language
     summaries.
  5. The two-track build plan — explains why the standard binary
     stays pure-Go and a parallel zddc-server-fips build is the right
     answer for federal customers.
  6. Engineering reference — links into the in-repo gap analysis,
     ARCHITECTURE.md security section, and access-control reference
     for implementors.

Linked from index.html in two places: a new feature bullet on the
zddc-server (optional) section pointing at the page, and a "For
federal evaluators" entry in the Learn-more list at the bottom.

No engineering content here — federal.html is the procurement entry
point. The deeper detail (NIST control numbers, library choices,
effort estimates) lives in zddc/README.md § Federal-readiness gap
analysis where engineers will look for it.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-04 21:33:16 -05:00